‘Mass immigration affects not only the economy, but also our identity’

(Hungarian Conservative. Tamás Gyurkovits).

laams Belang (Flemish Interest), which strives for Flemish independence, is currently Belgium’s most popular party. However, according to Tom van Grieken, the leader of the party, it is not enough to win the opinion polls. He wants to win the elections. In an interview with Hungarian Conservative, the 37-year-old chairman said that if they reach 50 per cent of the vote together with other Flemish nationalist parties in the upcoming elections, they will put the issue of independence on the table and give the voters what they have longed for: an anti-migration and family-friendly policy.

On 9 June Belgium will hold federal and regional parliamentary elections simultaneously with the European Parliament elections. Tom van Grieken’s nationalist, anti-globalist, anti-immigration party, Vlaams Belang, is miles ahead of all other parties with less than a month to go before a general election, according to current opinion polls, and has become the largest party in Flanders, the wealthiest and most populous region, with polls showing it has at least 26–27 per cent of the Flemish vote. On a federal level, Vlaams Belang is not part of the seven-party Belgian government. Tom van Grieken, with whom we had the opportunity to talk at CPAC Hungary in Budapest, told Hungarian Conservative: the biggest problem is that while the Flemish people represent about 60 per cent of the Belgian population and pay 70 per cent of taxes, their voice is barely heard, so they don’t even have the opportunity to change the system that defines their everyday life.

Continue reading

‘We now live in a world where common knowledge is being cancelled’ — An Interview with Leonardo Orlando

(Hungarian Conservative. Máté Lefler).

Leonardo Orlando holds a PhD in Political Science and International Relations from Sciences Po Paris. He was a Postdoctoral Researcher in Cognitive Science and Evolutionary Psychology at École Normale Supérieure de Paris, and holds bachelor’s and master’s degrees in Philosophy from the Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne. He has been a Research Fellow at the Centre for International Studies of Sciences Po Paris (CERI), at the French Institute for Research in Africa (IFRA-Nairobi) and at Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET, Argentina), as well as Visiting Scholar at The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University, at the University of Oslo and at the University of Economics in Bratislava. He has lectured in France, at Sciences Po Paris and at Sorbonne, and served as Assistant Professor in Argentina, at the Universidad de Ciencias Empresariales y Sociales (UCES) and at the Universidad Argentina de la Empresa (UADE). His research focuses on biological and evolutionary approaches to political behaviour. Currently he’s studying the collapse of the higher education system and how this affects society and jeopardizes the future of the West. We interviewed him in Budapest, where he came at the invitation of the Mathias Corvinus Collegium and the Danube Institute.

As an academic, have you ever come face to face with cancel culture? Yes, I had the opportunity to experience cancel culture first hand; I was going to teach evolutionary approaches to political behaviour at Science Po Paris, but in the end I was not allowed to. I obtained a PhD in political science and international relations, and also did a postdoc in cognitive science and evolutionary psychology. So, as an academic, I have been connected with Sciences Po for some time, and in the spring of 2022, I was preparing to teach two courses in that semester: one was on evolutionary political psychology, the other, which we were going to teach with philosopher Peggy Sastre, was on evolution and biology applied to gender. And the classes had been confirmed with the classroom, time, everything for a long time—but nine days before the beginning of the semester the courses were cancelled because the institution’s dean received a call from the gender scholars of Sciences Po. At this very particular moment, there were 82 classes about gender issues from the point of view of the denial of biology at Science Po—and it seems that there was no place for one that looked at the question of gender from an evolutionary and biological point of view. This eventually led to me giving up my academic career.

Continue reading